Ayodhya verdict: SC's judgment to affect Ram-Mandir row

India

27 Sep 2018

Ayodhya-verdict: How SC's judgment could change Babri Masjid dispute

In the afternoon on Thursday, the Supreme Court is set to deliver a crucial judgment which will have far-reaching consequences in the Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute.

Headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, the three-judge bench will decide whether a mosque is needed for praying in Islam or should the case be referred to a larger bench of seven or nine judges.

Looking back

Backstory: The Union of India v/s Ismail Faruqui case

Backstory: The Union of India v/s Ismail Faruqui case

In the 1994 Ismail Faruqui case, a five-judge Constitutional bench of the Supreme Court had noted that a mosque wasn't "an essential part of the practice of the religion of Islam".

This implied "its acquisition (by the state) is not prohibited by the provisions in the Constitution of India".

Muslim groups argued the 'sweeping' verdict needed to be revisited, as it will affect Babri Masjid dispute.

Muslim groups

Senior lawyer told SC previous judgment didn't consider religious texts

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan is representing M Siddiq's legal heir. Siddiq, one of the original litigants, died years ago.

Dhavan told the bench, comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer, that the previous judgment of apex court was announced without any inquiry and didn't take religious texts into consideration.

If the verdict is upheld, it will make their case weaker, he said.

Love India news?

Stay updated with the latest happenings.

Yes, notify Me

Government's stand

Representative of government feels Muslim groups delaying the matter

Representative of government feels Muslim groups delaying the matter

Separately, the Uttar Pradesh government has argued that some Muslim groups intended to delay the verdict by bringing up the decades-old judgment.

ASG Tushar Mehta, appearing for the government, said the 1994 verdict wasn't mentioned in pleas filed after 2010 verdict of Allahabad High Court.

In 2010, the HC divided the disputed land into three parts for the Masjid, Ram Lalla and Nirmohi Akhada.

Implications

SC's verdict will affect politics of the nation

If the top court upholds the earlier verdict, it is likely that governing BJP will milk this verdict to its benefit in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections.

But if the case is referred to a larger bench, the BJP's promise of temple-construction, laced with chest-thumping, will fall flat and the dispute will go on for a few years.

All eyes on SC now!

Share this timeline

Babri Masjid Dispute

Chief Justice Dipak Misra

Supreme Court Of India

Allahabad High Court

Chief Justice

India

Lok Sabha

Uttar Pradesh

Abdul Nazeer

ASG Tushar Mehta

Ashok Bhushan

Dipak Misra

HC

India Dipak Misra

Ismail Faruqui

Justices Ashok Bhushan

Nirmohi Akhada

Rajeev Dhavan

Ram Lalla

Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid

S. Abdul Nazeer

SC

Siddiq

Supreme Court

Union

Uttar Pradesh government

Share this timeline

Ask NewsBytes
User Image

Next Timeline