Ayodhya mediation: Here's what happened during previous attempts

India

08 Mar 2019

#AyodhyaMediation: Here's how talks panned out in the past

The Supreme Court on Friday decided the decades-old Ayodhya title dispute will be solved through mediation.

Headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi, the five-judge constitutional bench said mediation will ensure a permanent solution. Three members will participate in the court-monitored mediation.

However, this isn't the first time talks have been suggested to settle the sensitive issue.

Here's looking at how they panned out earlier.

Order

Backstory: Mediation won't be covered by media, ruled court

Backstory: Mediation won't be covered by media, ruled court

The panel will be headed by Justice FM Ibrahim Kalifulla and consists of spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and senior advocate Sriram Panchu.

Discussions will take place in Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh, and will be kept strictly confidential, the court ordered. The process should be completed in eight weeks.

If required, the panelists can induct new members, underlined the apex court.

Rao's message

Before Babri Masjid demolition, PM Rao spoke to both parties

History shows talks haven't been fruitful. Before Babri Masjid was demolished, former Prime Ministers Chandra Shekhar and PV Narasimha Rao brought Vishwa Hindu Parishad and All India Muslim Personal Law Board to the table for conversations.

In fact, Rao hinted to Muslim parties he wasn't averse to Ram temple construction when he said, "I can fight the BJP but I cannot fight Lord Ram."

Love India news?

Stay updated with the latest happenings.

Yes, notify Me

Shankaracharya

Kanchi Shankaracharya made a case for Hindus as well

Kanchi Shankaracharya made a case for Hindus as well

But after the 16th-century mosque was razed down by Hindu activists, all efforts became immaterial.

In 2003, Kanchi Shankaracharya took on the difficult task. But a contentious letter, which he wrote to AIMPLB, put a full stop to his efforts.

Shankaracharya reportedly asked Muslim bodies to be "ready" in case Hindus demanded lands in Kashi and Mathura too.

This angered them and mediation ended.

Allahabad HC

Even Allahabad HC tried to solve matter amicably

In 2010, the three-judge bench of Allahabad High Court hoped the matter will reach an amicable solution.

On August 3, 2010, lawyers of all parties were called for a discussion in chambers. But the Hindu side reportedly didn't wish to reconcile.

Later, the HC divided the land equally among all three parties- Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board, and Nirmohi Akhara.

SC's suggestion

These issues should be decided jointly, former CJI had said

These issues should be decided jointly, former CJI had said

The Allahabad HC order was challenged in Supreme Court by all parties. In 2017, former CJI JS Khehar also suggested taking the mediation route.

He said the issue was much bigger than a property dispute.

"Give a bit, take a bit. Make an effort to sort it out. These are issues best decided jointly. These are issues of sentiments and religion," he had said.

Options

Justice Khehar was ready to sit with mediators as well

Justice Khehar had even volunteered to sit with mediators chosen by all sides.

"You want me, I am ready to do it. You don't want me, I won't. If you want my brother judges, you can take them but first try to sit with each other and resolve it," he said.

But parties refused it and asked the court to give a verdict.

Hopes

All eyes are set on panel

All eyes are set on panel

The latest verdict is court-mandated and could likely solve the issue.

Reacting on the order, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, said mediation is the only way and added everyone should move forward towards ending "long-standing conflicts".

Whereas the head of panel, Justice (Retd.) Kalifullah said, "I can say if a committee has been constituted we will take every effort to resolve the issue amicably."

Share this timeline

Ayodhya

Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court

Uttar Pradesh

AIMPLB

All India Muslim Personal Law Board

Allahabad HC

Allahabad High Court

AyodhyaMediation

Babri Masjid

Chandra Shekhar

CJI JS Khehar

CJI Ranjan Gogoi

Even Allahabad HC

Ibrahim Kalifulla

India Muslim Personal Law Board

Justice FM Ibrahim Kalifulla

Justice Khehar

Kanchi Shankaracharya

Lord Ram

Narasimha Rao

Nirmohi Akhara

PM Rao

Prime Ministers Chandra Shekhar

PV Narasimha Rao

Ram Lalla

Ravi Shankar

Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

Sriram Panchu

Sunni Waqf Board

Vishwa Hindu Parishad

Share this timeline

Ask NewsBytes
User Image

Most asked questions

What is the Ayodhya case all about?

When was Babri Masjid demolished?

What did Allahabad HC say in its verdict on Ayodhya issue?

How many people are there in the mediation panel?

More questions

What is the Ayodhya case all about?

Asked 2019-03-08 16:49:58 by Muhammad Banerjee

Answered by NewsBytes

The Ayodhya case pertains to 2.77 acres of land in Uttar Pradesh. Hindu believe Lord Rama took human form at the spot where Babri Masjid was constructed.

When was Babri Masjid demolished?

Asked 2019-03-08 16:49:58 by Vibhore Sen

Answered by NewsBytes

The Babri Masjid was demolished in 1992.

What did Allahabad HC say in its verdict on Ayodhya issue?

Asked 2019-03-08 16:49:58 by Sai Rao

Answered by NewsBytes

Allahabad HC divided the land equally among all three parties: Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board, and Nirmohi Akhara.

How many people are there in the mediation panel?

Asked 2019-03-08 16:49:58 by Sanvi Gavde

Answered by NewsBytes

The mediation panel consists of three people. The panelists may induct new members if they want.

Next Timeline