CJI Gogoi's sexual harassment case marred by prejudice

India

05 May 2019

Everything wrong with CJI Ranjan Gogoi sexual harassment case

The Supreme Court of India has become the center of controversy ever since a former employee of the apex court leveled allegations of sexual harassment against the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.

Several senior judges have defended the CJI and with the claims of a conspiracy involving Dawood Ibrahim and Jet Airways, the case gets even murkier and digresses from the original narrative.

History

Complainant claims she was sexually harassed, fired and intimidated

Complainant claims she was sexually harassed, fired and intimidated

According to her complaint, the woman worked in the CJI's office as a junior court assistant from October 2016 to October 2018.

She claimed the CJI sexually harassed her and later initiated a disciplinary inquiry against her. She was dismissed from service on December 21.

In March, she was booked under a "false" bribery case.

Her family was also allegedly intimidated and victimized.

Early developments

When the CJI had presided over his own case

On April 19, the complainant sent an affidavit to 22 SC judges claiming that the CJI had sexually harassed her and later used intimidation to silence her.

After three news outlets broke the story, the CJI hastily convened a special bench - comprising himself, Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Sanjiv Khanna - without listing a cause, matter, or a petition.

Love India news?

Stay updated with the latest happenings.

Yes, notify Me

Problems

Justice Gogoi misused CJI status to dismiss allegations

Justice Gogoi misused CJI status to dismiss allegations

After the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, Sanjeev S. Kalgaonkar, had already dismissed the allegations as "completely and absolutely false," CJI Gogoi spoke from the Bench in an official capacity, presiding over his own case, and labeled it an attempt to "deactivate the CJI."

Instead of speaking as the CJI, Justice Gogoi could have approached the press, as he had done in the past.

Problems

Allegations against CJI seen as an attack on judiciary

Several senior Justices, the Bar Council of India, the Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association, and the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley condemned the allegations against the CJI as an attack on the judiciary without any investigation whatsoever.

Four days after the allegations were made, the CJI appointed Justice SA Bobde to head a three-member in-house committee to investigate the claims of sexual harassment.

My character damaged without hearing me: Complainant

The complainant was left "frightened and helpless" after the special sitting held in suo moto proceedings, worried that she'd been "declared false by the Hon'ble Judges and senior law officers." She said, "My character was damaged without any reason and without hearing me."

Problems

In-house panel not in keeping with Vishakha guidelines, POSH Act

In-house panel not in keeping with Vishakha guidelines, POSH Act

The in-house panel initially comprised Justices Bobde, NV Ramana and Indira Banerjee.

Citing Vishakha guidelines and POSH Act, the complainant requested majority women members on the panel and an external member.

Meanwhile, Justice Ramana recused himself from the panel but not before further trashing the complainant's claims before she even recorded a statement.

He was replaced by Justice Indu Malhotra on April 25.

Requests

Complainant not allowed legal representation, statement recordings

The complainant had also reasonably requested for legal representation.

She had also demanded a committee of senior retired judges to conduct the inquiry since one conducted by CJI's peers risks lack of objectivity.

Both requests were denied.

There was no external member on the committee, as mandated by law.

Additionally, the request for a video/audio recording of her statements was also denied.

Regulations

No pre-established in-house procedure for CJI as respondent

No pre-established in-house procedure for CJI as respondent

Advocate S. Devika explains that when the Supreme Court adopted the in-house procedure in December 1999 to take remedial action against judges, three sets of procedures were laid out: for judges of the high court, for chief justices of high courts, and for Supreme Court judges.

Writing for The Wire, Devika states that no procedure was established when the CJI is the respondent.

Recent updates

Complainant backed-out of proceedings as justice 'unlikely'

After participating in the proceedings for three days, the complainant backed-out as she felt she wasn't "likely to get justice."

"The committee seemed not to appreciate the fact that this was not an ordinary complaint but a complaint of sexual harassment against a sitting CJI," she stated.

She also wasn't allowed an assistant for her hearing disability and found the "informal proceedings" intimidating.

Conspiracy

Advocate Utsav Bains alleges larger conspiracy to remove CJI

Advocate Utsav Bains alleges larger conspiracy to remove CJI

Separately, on April 20, advocate Utsav Bains alleged a larger conspiracy involving underworld don Dawood Ibrahim and Jet Airways founder Naresh Goyal.

Bains was allegedly offered Rs. 1.5cr to file a "false case of sexual harassment" against the CJI.

Retired SC Justice AK Patnaik heads an inquiry into the alleged conspiracy, which has currently been stalled to avoid clashes with Bobde inquiry.

Conclusion

Indian judiciary is in peril, alright

The way this case has transpired, it's become evident that the complainant was prejudged, ironically so by Supreme Court judges, who have failed to look at the case objectively.

Meanwhile, CJI Gogoi continues to preside over India's highest court giving him access to manipulate the very inquiry against him.

In a way, whoever said the judiciary is in peril, was right.

Share this timeline

Chief Justice of India

CJI

CJI Gogoi

Ranjan Gogoi

Sexual Harassment

Sexual Harassment At Workplace

Supreme Court

Utsav Bains

, the Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association

Advocate S

Advocate Utsav Bains

Arun Jaitley

Arun Mishra

Bar Council

Bar Council of India

Chief Justice

Citing Vishakha

CJI Ranjan Gogoi

Dawood Ibrahim

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley

India

India Ranjan Gogoi

Indira Banerjee

Indu Malhotra

Jet Airways

Justice Arun Mishra

Justice Gogoi

Justice Indu Malhotra

Justice Ramana

Justice SA Bobde

Justice Sanjiv Khanna

Justices Bobde

Naresh Goyal

NV Ramana

POSH Act

Retired SC Justice AK Patnaik

S. Devika

Sanjeev S

Sanjeev S. Kalgaonkar

Sanjiv Khanna

SC Justice AK Patnaik

Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association

Supreme Court Of India

Wire

Share this timeline

Ask NewsBytes
User Image

Most asked questions

What are the allegations against CJI Ranjan Gogoi?

Who accused CJI Ranjan Gogoi of sexual harassment?

What is the conspiracy against CJI Ranjan Gogoi?

When did the allegations against CJI Ranjan Gogoi surface?

More questions

What are the allegations against CJI Ranjan Gogoi?

Asked 2019-05-05 19:04:02 by Shaurya Mehra

Answered by NewsBytes

A former Supreme Court staffer has alleged that CJI Ranjan Gogoi sexually harassed her when she was appointed at his residence office in October 2018.

Who accused CJI Ranjan Gogoi of sexual harassment?

Asked 2019-05-05 19:04:02 by Surabhi Pawar

Answered by NewsBytes

The identity of the victim has been concealed, however, we know that she formerly used to work as the junior court assistant at the Supreme Court.

What is the conspiracy against CJI Ranjan Gogoi?

Asked 2019-05-05 19:04:02 by Parakram Rao

Answered by NewsBytes

Advocate Utsav Bains claims he was offered a bribe to file a false case of sexual harassment against the CJI. He claims the conspirators, who involve underworld don Dawood Ibrahim and Jet Airways founder Naresh Goyal, want to remove the CJI.

When did the allegations against CJI Ranjan Gogoi surface?

Asked 2019-05-05 19:04:02 by Ananya Tambe

Answered by NewsBytes

The allegations against CJI Ranjan Gogoi came to the fore when the complainant submitted an affidavit on April 19. News of the complaint broke the next day.

Next Timeline