Written byShalini Ojha ·
The petitioners include politicians, activists, and civil society members, who argue the new law contradicts the basic tenets of the Indian constitution.
Since it was tabled last month, CAA has only sparked protests across the nation.
The new law, passed in the parliament in December, amended Section 2 of the Citizenship Act which defined "illegal immigrants".
Courtesy the amendments, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis or Christians who came to India from Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, on or before December 31, 2014, will be given preferential treatment when applying for citizenship.
By excluding Muslims from the law's ambit, the BJP-led Centre sparked protests.
Some of the petitioners want SC to declare the law "unconstitutional", while others are questioning its constitutional validity.
The petitions first came up for hearing on December 18, 2019, when some 60 petitions were filed. Back then, the top court issued notices to Centre and Attorney General KK Venugopal.
Thereafter, Centre filed a plea seeking transfer of CAA-related cases from high courts to SC.
This month, SC refused urgent hearing on a plea seeking to declare CAA unconstitutional, saying that the atmosphere in the country wasn't apt.
"There is so much violence going on. The country is going through difficult times and the endeavor should be for peace... This court's job is to determine the validity of a law and not declare it as constitutional," the bench said.
Congress MP Jairam Ramesh, who is one of the petitioners, called the law "brazen attack" on the constitution and said it treated "equals as unequals".
Similarly, Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) argued CAA defies the fundamental Right of Equality.
Other petitioners include AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi, Trinamool parliamentarian Mahua Moitra, All Assam Students' Union and Tripura royal scion Pradyot Kishore Deb Barman.
On Tuesday night, around 20 women and children gathered outside the top court. As per reports, they squatted at the front gate prompting police to disperse them.
Facing heat, the government has repeatedly claimed that the law isn't meant to snatch citizenship but welcome persecuted religious minorities with open arms.
He said CAA will stay, no matter what.
A couple of states, including Kerala, West Bengal, and Punjab, have asserted they won't implement the law.
But Centre told them skipping the implementation is not an option as matters of citizenship are solely decided by Centre.
In a rare incident, Congress' Kapil Sibal said states can ask the Central government to withdraw the law, but they can't refuse to implement it.
Love India news?
Subscribe to stay updated.