Politics

Relief for AIADMK-government: Madras HC delivers split-verdict on MLAs' disqualification

14 Jun 2018 | By Gogona Saikia
Madras HC divided on AIADMK MLAs' disqualification

The Madras HC failed to deliver a unanimous verdict on the disqualification of 18 AIADMK MLAs last year.

While Chief Justice Indira Banerjee upheld the move, Justice M Sundar disagreed.

The matter will now be referred to a larger bench.

The 18 MLAs had taken the matter to court after they were disqualified by the party for backing rebel TTV Dhinakaran.

In context: Madras HC divided on AIADMK MLAs' disqualification

14 Jun 2018Relief for AIADMK-government: Madras HC delivers split-verdict on MLAs' disqualification

BackgroundUnderstanding the conditions behind the disqualification

AIADMK has seen a dramatic power struggle since former chief Jayalalithaa's death in 2016.

Immediately afterwards, her close aide VK Sasikala took over, but her tenure was cut short when she was sentenced in a disproportionate assets case.

The party split into two factions led by E Palaniswami and O Pannerseelvam. Dhinakaran, Sasikala's nephew, initially sided with the former, but later turned against him.

Love Politics news?
Stay updated with the latest happenings.
A split and the eventual decision

SplitA split and the eventual decision

These 18 MLAs supporting Dhinakaran had written to then-TN Governor C Vidyasagar Rao withdrawing support from CM E Palaniswami.

However, they had clarified they aren't withdrawing support from the AIADMK government.

Eventually, a power-sharing arrangement was worked out, wherein Palaniswami remained CM and Panneerseelvam was made Deputy-CM.

The assembly speaker then disqualified the MLAs based on the 1986 Tamil Nadu Assembly Members Anti-Defection Law.

VerdictHere's what happened at today's verdict

Today, Banerjee upheld the disqualification, saying she found it reasonable, but Sundar held it violates the principles of natural justice.

The matter will now be referred to a third judge, to be picked by the second seniormost judge, Justice Huluvadi G Ramesh.

They will deliver the verdict after taking cognizance from both sides again. It is expected to take at least two more months.

ImplicationWhat it means for the ruling AIADMK government

The verdict can have major implications. If disqualification is upheld, there'd be no threat to AIADMK, since its strength in the 234-member assembly will come to 215.

But it'd necessitate bypolls in 18 seats, which could hit it hard.

However, if it's cancelled, the government could collapse. Recently, three lawmakers extended support to Dhinakaran, bringing AIADMK's numbers down to 113, four short of majority.