SC says consensual relationship can't be called rape later, quashes FIR against lawyer
The Supreme Court has quashed a rape case against advocate Samadhan, ruling that a long-term consensual relationship can't be labeled as rape after things turn sour.
The case was filed by a married woman who alleged that they engaged in sexual relations multiple times between March 2022 and May 2024, and claimed the lawyer asked her to end three pregnancies.
No proof of force or fraud, says court
The judges found no evidence of coercion or false promises—pointing out that the woman's actions showed clear consent.
They highlighted that real cases under this law involve threats or pressure, which weren't present here.
Credible evidence matters in serious allegations
The court stressed that claims like these need solid proof—not just accusations.
They also noted the complaint came only after the lawyer refused to pay her money.
This ruling makes it clear: you can't call a mutual relationship rape just because things fall apart later on.