New Zealand book award disqualifies two writers. Reason? AI cover-art
What's the story
Two New Zealand authors, Stephanie Johnson and Elizabeth Smither, have been disqualified from the 2026 Ockham book awards. This is because artificial intelligence was used in cover design by the publisher's design team, unbeknownst to the authors. The books in question are Johnson's short story collection Obligate Carnivore and Smither's novella collection Angel Train. The decision was made after the awards committee updated its guidelines on AI usage in August, well after the books' covers had been designed.
Publisher's stance
Publisher criticizes timing of AI guidelines update
Quentin Wilson, the publisher of both books, criticized the timing of the guidelines update. He said it was "far too late" for publishers to consider this clause in their design briefs. "It is obviously heartbreaking that two wonderful pieces of fiction by highly respected authors have become embroiled in this issue," he told The Guardian.
Authors' reaction
Authors express disappointment over disqualification
Johnson expressed her disappointment over the disqualification, saying she was unaware that AI was used in her book's cover design. "I'd be lying if I said I wasn't sad about it," she told The Guardian. Smither also defended her book's cover design, which features a steam train and an angel inspired by Marc Chagall's art.
Trust's defense
Ockham awards trust defends decision, cites copyright concerns
Nicola Legat, chair of the book awards trust that runs the Ockham awards, defended the decision saying it was made to protect creative and copyright interests. She said while they regret disqualifying such esteemed writers, "the criteria apply to all entrants." The trust is open to revisiting these criteria as AI technology continues to evolve.
Industry response
Industry calls for clearer guidelines on AI use
Wilson stressed the need for clearer guidelines to prevent such situations in the future. He pointed out that tools like Grammarly and Photoshop, which use AI, are commonly used by publishers and authors. The incident has sparked a wider debate about the role of AI in creative fields and the need for balanced regulations that protect artistic integrity without stifling innovation.