NewsBytes
    Hindi Tamil Telugu
    More
    In the news
    Supreme Court Of India
    Central Bureau Of Investigation (CBI)
    Indian Army
    Indian Railways
    Indian Air Force
    NewsBytes
    Hindi Tamil Telugu
    NewsBytes
    User Placeholder

    Hi,

    Logout


    India Business World Politics Sports Technology Entertainment Auto Lifestyle Inspirational Career Bengaluru Delhi Mumbai Visual Stories Find Cricket Statistics Phones Reviews Fitness Bands Reviews Speakers Reviews

    Download Android App

    Follow us on
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linkedin
     
    Home / News / India News / Everything wrong with CJI Ranjan Gogoi sexual harassment case
    India

    Everything wrong with CJI Ranjan Gogoi sexual harassment case

    Everything wrong with CJI Ranjan Gogoi sexual harassment case
    Written by Siddhant Pandey
    May 05, 2019, 07:05 pm 5 min read
    Everything wrong with CJI Ranjan Gogoi sexual harassment case

    The Supreme Court of India has become the center of controversy ever since a former employee of the apex court leveled allegations of sexual harassment against the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi. Several senior judges have defended the CJI and with the claims of a conspiracy involving Dawood Ibrahim and Jet Airways, the case gets even murkier and digresses from the original narrative.

    Complainant claims she was sexually harassed, fired and intimidated

    According to her complaint, the woman worked in the CJI's office as a junior court assistant from October 2016 to October 2018. She claimed the CJI sexually harassed her and later initiated a disciplinary inquiry against her. She was dismissed from service on December 21. In March, she was booked under a "false" bribery case. Her family was also allegedly intimidated and victimized.

    When the CJI had presided over his own case

    On April 19, the complainant sent an affidavit to 22 SC judges claiming that the CJI had sexually harassed her and later used intimidation to silence her. After three news outlets broke the story, the CJI hastily convened a special bench - comprising himself, Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Sanjiv Khanna - without listing a cause, matter, or a petition.

    Justice Gogoi misused CJI status to dismiss allegations

    After the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, Sanjeev S. Kalgaonkar, had already dismissed the allegations as "completely and absolutely false," CJI Gogoi spoke from the Bench in an official capacity, presiding over his own case, and labeled it an attempt to "deactivate the CJI." Instead of speaking as the CJI, Justice Gogoi could have approached the press, as he had done in the past.

    Allegations against CJI seen as an attack on judiciary

    Several senior Justices, the Bar Council of India, the Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association, and the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley condemned the allegations against the CJI as an attack on the judiciary without any investigation whatsoever. Four days after the allegations were made, the CJI appointed Justice SA Bobde to head a three-member in-house committee to investigate the claims of sexual harassment.

    My character damaged without hearing me: Complainant

    The complainant was left "frightened and helpless" after the special sitting held in suo moto proceedings, worried that she'd been "declared false by the Hon'ble Judges and senior law officers." She said, "My character was damaged without any reason and without hearing me."

    In-house panel not in keeping with Vishakha guidelines, POSH Act

    The in-house panel initially comprised Justices Bobde, NV Ramana and Indira Banerjee. Citing Vishakha guidelines and POSH Act, the complainant requested majority women members on the panel and an external member. Meanwhile, Justice Ramana recused himself from the panel but not before further trashing the complainant's claims before she even recorded a statement. He was replaced by Justice Indu Malhotra on April 25.

    Complainant not allowed legal representation, statement recordings

    The complainant had also reasonably requested for legal representation. She had also demanded a committee of senior retired judges to conduct the inquiry since one conducted by CJI's peers risks lack of objectivity. Both requests were denied. There was no external member on the committee, as mandated by law. Additionally, the request for a video/audio recording of her statements was also denied.

    No pre-established in-house procedure for CJI as respondent

    Advocate S. Devika explains that when the Supreme Court adopted the in-house procedure in December 1999 to take remedial action against judges, three sets of procedures were laid out: for judges of the high court, for chief justices of high courts, and for Supreme Court judges. Writing for The Wire, Devika states that no procedure was established when the CJI is the respondent.

    Complainant backed-out of proceedings as justice 'unlikely'

    After participating in the proceedings for three days, the complainant backed-out as she felt she wasn't "likely to get justice." "The committee seemed not to appreciate the fact that this was not an ordinary complaint but a complaint of sexual harassment against a sitting CJI," she stated. She also wasn't allowed an assistant for her hearing disability and found the "informal proceedings" intimidating.

    Advocate Utsav Bains alleges larger conspiracy to remove CJI

    Separately, on April 20, advocate Utsav Bains alleged a larger conspiracy involving underworld don Dawood Ibrahim and Jet Airways founder Naresh Goyal. Bains was allegedly offered Rs. 1.5cr to file a "false case of sexual harassment" against the CJI. Retired SC Justice AK Patnaik heads an inquiry into the alleged conspiracy, which has currently been stalled to avoid clashes with Bobde inquiry.

    Indian judiciary is in peril, alright

    The way this case has transpired, it's become evident that the complainant was prejudged, ironically so by Supreme Court judges, who have failed to look at the case objectively. Meanwhile, CJI Gogoi continues to preside over India's highest court giving him access to manipulate the very inquiry against him. In a way, whoever said the judiciary is in peril, was right.

    Share this timeline
    Facebook
    Whatsapp
    Twitter
    Linkedin
    India
    Supreme Court Of India
    Sexual Harassment
    Dawood Ibrahim

    India

    How Facebook's secretive cryptocurrency might work Facebook
    #HealthBytes: Top five food items to beat exam stress Health & Wellness
    #NewsBytesExclusive: Lemonop, app that helps students find paid part-time gigs NewsBytes
    #CareerBytes: 5 famous Chartered Accountants in India to know about Padma Shri

    Supreme Court Of India

    Muzaffarpur shelter-home case: 11 missing girls may have been murdered Bihar
    #RafaleDeal: Center files fresh affidavit in Rafale review case India
    Sexual harassment case: CJI Gogoi appears before committee, answers questions Sexual Harassment
    Applying for PAN card offline? Avoid these mistakes India

    Sexual Harassment

    MJ Akbar deposes in defamation suit against journalist Priya Ramani Defamation Case
    CJI sexual harassment case: Woman walks out of inquiry panel India
    Delhi-HC rejects plea restricting media from publishing allegations against CJI Supreme Court Of India
    CJI sexual harassment case: Complainant appears before committee India

    Dawood Ibrahim

    Ex-aide of gangster Dawood, Lambu Shakeel, dies of heart ailment Mumbai
    Pakistan should return Dawood to show stand against terrorism: Govt-sources Pakistan News
    Al Jazeera releases documentary, claims evidence of spot-fixing in cricket International Cricket Council (ICC)
    UK: Dawood's key aide Jabir Moti arrested at London hotel India

    Love India News?

    Subscribe to stay updated.

    India Thumbnail
    Indian Premier League (IPL) Celebrity Hollywood Bollywood UEFA Champions League Tennis Football Smartphones Cryptocurrency Upcoming Movies Premier League Cricket News Latest automobiles Latest Cars Upcoming Cars Latest Bikes Upcoming Tablets
    About Us Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Contact Us Ethical Conduct Grievance Redressal News News Archive Topics Archive Download DevBytes Find Cricket Statistics
    Follow us on
    Facebook Twitter Linkedin
    All rights reserved © NewsBytes 2023