LOADING...
Delhi consumers may see higher electricity bills: Here's why
Delhi owes nearly ₹30,000 crore to power distribution companies and discoms

Delhi consumers may see higher electricity bills: Here's why

Apr 20, 2026
06:03 pm

What's the story

Delhi's electricity consumers could be facing a hike in their power bills, thanks to a recent decision by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL). The tribunal has rejected a plea from the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) for more time to clear dues of nearly ₹30,000 crore owed to power distribution companies or discoms. These dues are part of a broader plan to settle long-pending regulatory assets in the power sector.

Tribunal ruling

APTEL rejects DERC plea for more time to clear dues

The DERC had sought more time from APTEL to clear these dues, arguing that a longer repayment period could prevent an abrupt spike in electricity bills for consumers. However, with the tribunal rejecting this plea, Delhi now has to stick to its original repayment schedule. This comes after a Supreme Court order in August 2025 directing all state electricity regulators to start clearing such dues from April 2024 and finish by April 2028.

Court order

Supreme Court allows tariff revisions to recover pending amounts

The Supreme Court also permitted regulators to revise electricity tariffs if required, to recover the pending amounts. This puts Delhi in a tough spot as electricity rates have been slashed in recent years while unpaid dues have continued to rise. Unlike other states where governments may absorb such costs, Delhi's power distribution system is managed by private companies.

Advertisement

Consumer burden

Consumers likely to bear the brunt of the situation

As a result, the burden of clearing these dues could fall on consumers through higher electricity bills, government subsidy support, or a combination of both in the coming months. The situation is particularly sensitive as power distribution companies BSES Yamuna Power Limited and BSES Rajdhani Power Limited are privately run. This leaves little room for the state to fully shield consumers without significant subsidy support.

Advertisement