LOADING...
Summarize
Lok Sabha speaker forms panel to probe Justice Yashwant Varma 
Justice Varma is under investigation

Lok Sabha speaker forms panel to probe Justice Yashwant Varma 

Aug 12, 2025
01:25 pm

What's the story

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla has announced a three-member panel to investigate allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma. The committee comprises Supreme Court Justice Aravind Kumar, Madras High Court Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, and Karnataka High Court senior advocate BV Acharya. Birla has also accepted an impeachment motion against Justice Varma, signed by 146 Members of Parliament. He said, "The Parliament is united against corruption. We have accepted the impeachment motion... People have faith in the judiciary."

Investigation process

Panel's findings will be submitted to Lok Sabha Speaker

The three-member panel has the authority to summon evidence and cross-examine witnesses. Its findings will be submitted to the Lok Sabha Speaker, who will then present them to the House. If found guilty, a motion will be put to vote in both Houses of Parliament before being sent to the President for approval.

Controversial allegations

Controversy began when firefighters discovered burnt cash in March

Justice Varma is at the center of the controversy after a fire at his residence in Delhi on March 14, which led to firefighters discovering unaccounted cash. Although he denied any connection to the cash, an in-house panel of the Supreme Court recommended his impeachment based on its findings. The recommendation was sent to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna.

Petition dismissal

Supreme Court dismissed Justice Varma's challenge last month

Justice Varma challenged the top court panel's recommendation in a writ petition, where he tried to stay anonymous by referring to himself as 'XXX' in court documents. He cited five reasons against his removal, including questioning the jurisdiction of the in-house committee. However, on July 30, the Supreme Court dismissed his challenge as "not worth entertaining" and criticized him for his "not confidence-inspiring conduct."