Sonu Sood is a "habitual offender," BMC tells High Court

Last week, in response to an illegal construction notice issued by the BMC, the actor had filed a petition in the Bombay High Court denying the allegations.

His lawyer had stated, "The petitioner has not made any changes in the building that warrant permission from the BMC. Only those changes that are allowed under the MRTP Act have been done (sic)."

The BMC has claimed that Sood is protecting his illegal property.

In the affidavit filed by BMC, the body claimed, "The appellant is a habitual offender and wants to enjoy the commercial proceeds of unauthorized work and therefore once again started reconstructing the demolished portion in order to make it operational as a hotel albeit illegally and without permission from the License department (sic)."

The civic body stated, "The appellant has not been given permission for change of user of the said property from residential to commercial and there is no license to run the commercial hotel (sic)."

BMC further claimed that the actor sought umbrage under the baseless allegations of harassment and malafides.

It alleged that despite actions in the past, the actor continued the unauthorized work.

The municipal corporation disclosed that initial demolition work against Sood's property was carried out on November 12, 2018, but the actor "once again started alterations and reconstructed the demolished portion (sic)."

"The BMC once again took action of demolition on February 14, 2020 (sic)," revealed the affidavit.

As per BMC, Sood had no documents to prove that the property belongs to him.

Earlier this month, the civic body had filed a complaint against Sood at the Juhu Police station for reportedly converting his building into a commercial hotel without the due permission from the municipal corporation.

Last year also, the BMC had issued a notice under Section 53 (1) of the Monopolistic and Restrictive Trade Practices Act against Sood asking him to get the approval.