LOADING...
Vashu Bhagnani slams David, Varun over 'Coolie No. 1' losses
Vashu Bhagnani is in a legal battle with the Dhawans

Vashu Bhagnani slams David, Varun over 'Coolie No. 1' losses

May 23, 2026
02:38 pm

What's the story

Producer Vashu Bhagnani has revealed that actor Varun Dhawan hasn't contacted him in two years, even after their film Coolie No. 1 suffered a massive loss of ₹27 crore. The revelation was made during a virtual press conference where Bhagnani also spoke about his ongoing legal battle with David Dhawan and music label Tips Industries. The lawsuit is over the alleged unauthorized use of intellectual property from Biwi No. 1 in Dhawan's next film, Hai Jawani Toh Ishq Hona Hai.

Disappointment expressed

'I lost a lot of money being with him'

Bhagnani said, "Very honestly, after this case, there is some bitterness in all relationships. But Varun hasn't called me in 2 years anyway." "We made Coolie No. 1 in 2020, suffered a loss of ₹27 crore, but he never even bothered to ask how I was doing." "I lost a lot of money being with him." "I paid David ji big money to make that film; almost ₹70 crore, which was not even his worth."

Emotional turmoil

'My heart is broken': Bhagnani

Bhagnani added, "My heart is broken. I am not afraid of anyone in this world, not even my father." "I am proud that I have never done wrong to anyone. But I am broken because after doing so much, they are making me out to be the thief, the fool." "Varun Dhawan is saying these things. David Ji is saying these things. Ramesh Ji too. There is no need for this."

Advertisement

Legal dispute

Bhagnani wants to settle the dispute

Hai Jawani..., directed by David, seemingly features songs Ishq Sona Hai and Chunari Chunari, originally from Biwi No. 1, sparking a legal tussle. Bhagnani said, "We had such a good relationship. Even now, I am saying, call them on this call, I will settle it in 10 minutes." "But if they don't want to, how can it be settled?" Bhagnani claimed that while Tips owned audio rights, the film-linked intellectual property and recreation permissions still required his consent.

Advertisement