Delhi court extends interim protection from arrest to Vadra's aide
(Sourced from PTI)
A Delhi court today extended till February 6 the interim protection from arrest granted to Manoj Arora, a close aide of UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi's son-in-law Robert Vadra, in a money laundering case. Special Public Prosecutor D P Singh, appearing for the Enforcement Directorate (ED) told Special Judge Arvind Kumar that Arora was cooperating in the probe. Read the details here.
ED's Special Public Prosecutor Nitesh Rana sought two more weeks for arguments on the application which was allowed by the court. Rana said it remained to be seen if Arora would cooperate further. The case relates to allegations of money-laundering in the purchase of a London-based property, located at 12, Bryanston Square, worth 1.9 million pounds, which is allegedly owned by Vadra.
In the last hearing, Arora had alleged before the court that the case was foisted on him by the NDA-government out of "political vendetta". However, ED refuted the allegations, asking, "should no authority investigate any political bigwig because that will be called a political vendetta?"
The agency had told the court that it lodged the money laundering case against Arora after his role came up during the probe of another case by the Income Tax Department under the newly-enacted Black Money Act and tax law against absconding arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari. It said the London-based property was bought by Bhandari for 1.9 million pounds (over Rs. 17 crores).
The ED said Bhandari sold the property in 2010 for the same amount despite incurring additional expenses of approximately 65,900 pounds (over Rs. 60 lakhs) on its renovation. "This gives credence to the fact that Bhandari was not the actual owner of the property but it was beneficially owned by Vadra who was incurring expenditure on the renovation of this property," it said.
Manoj Arora, an employee of Robert Vadra's Skylight Hospitality LLP, was a key person in the case and he was aware of the latter's overseas undeclared assets. He was also instrumental in arranging funds, the ED had told the court.
