After UNSC's J&K meeting, India says matter 'internal', rebukes Pakistan

Notably, UNSC agreed to closed-door talks after China, Pakistan's all-weather ally, made a request.

This was the first meeting in five decades which UN convened to discuss J&K. It was in 1965 when such a meeting was called the last time.

By signing the 1972 Simla Agreement, India and Pakistan decided to resolve issues bilaterally, leaving little room for the international community to intervene.

Both India and Pakistan weren't a part of the consultations. The five permanent members of UNSC, namely China, US, UK, Russia, and France, as well as 10 non-permanent members, Belgium, Cote d'Ivoire, Dominican Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Germany, Indonesia, Kuwait, Peru, Poland, and South Africa, discussed J&K at the informal meeting.

Barring China, no other member made a statement about the meeting.

As expected, China took a stand similar to Pakistan and spoke about "human rights violations".

Zhang Jun, Beijing's envoy to UN, claimed UNSC members were "concerned about the human rights situation there and also it's the general view of members that parties concerned should refrain from taking any unilateral action that might further aggravate the tension".

Thereafter, India came up with a strong rebuttal.

Rebuking China, India's Permanent UN Ambassador Syed Akbaruddin said, "For the first time after the end of Security Council consultations, we noted that two states (China and Pakistan) who made national statements tried to pass them off as the will of the international community."

Maintaining that New Delhi's decisions related to J&K were internal, Akbaruddin told media that restrictions will be eased gradually.

Akbaruddin also underlined that UNSC appreciated India's efforts to restore normalcy in the valley.

Hours before the meeting, J&K Chief Secretary BVR Subrahmanyam addressed press to inform that government offices were re-opened and educational institutions would start functioning normally from next week.

"We are gratified that the Security Council in its closed consultations appreciated these efforts," Akbaruddin went on.

Taking a jibe at Pakistan, Akbaruddin said Islamabad should stop sponsoring terrorism to start talks. He said Pakistan was trying to project an "alarmist" approach, which was nowhere close to ground realities.

"Of particular concern is that one state is using the terminology of 'jihad' against and promoting violence in India including by their leaders," he said.

India wants to ensure peace in Kashmir, he added.