LOADING...
Summarize
SC refuses to stay 'Udaipur Files'; directs case to HC
Supreme Court refused to stay 'Udaipur Files' release

SC refuses to stay 'Udaipur Files'; directs case to HC

Jul 25, 2025
02:41 pm

What's the story

The Supreme Court of India has refused to stay the release of the controversial film Udaipur Files, which is based on the 2022 murder of tailor Kanhaiya Lal in Udaipur. The court on Friday asked all parties involved to approach the Delhi High Court instead. A bench led by Justice Surya Kant heard multiple petitions related to the film's certification, content, and potential impact on an ongoing trial.

Legal arguments

Petitioners can't seek arbitrary stay on movies: Justice Kant

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind President Maulana Arshad Madani, argued that the film was "hate speech masquerading as free speech." He urged the court to stay its release. However, Justice Kant countered that courts cannot arbitrarily stay movies post-certification. Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia, representing the film's producer (Jani Firefox Media Pvt Ltd), accused the petitioners of "forum shopping" and said they failed to make a case.

Court's ruling

Matter to be heard next Monday

The court declined to stay the film's release for now but said a brief, reasoned order would follow. Both sides were told to pursue their grievances before the Delhi High Court, with the matter likely to be listed on July 28. The film depicts the 2022 killing of Lal, who was beheaded by two men for allegedly sharing a post supporting BJP leader Nupur Sharma.

High court's intervention

Madani's plea; Centre-appointed panel reviewed film

The Delhi High Court had earlier stayed the film's release till the Centre took a call. This was after hearing a plea by Madani. The court also referred to a report by a Centre-appointed committee that reviewed the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certificate granted to Udaipur Files. The committee recommended certain changes, including replacing the existing disclaimer with a new one and removing frames in the credits thanking various individuals. However, these were criticized as being too weak.